Obama: Tyrant or Traitor?

There is a debate raging in the sanctum sanctorum of many conservatives' minds: Is Obama a a delusional Marxist-indoctrinated creep, or dare we say, a traitor? The immediate and unhesitating response from the majority of people is to scoff at the last assertion, but the O's history of communist associations and track record of causing economic destruction, violating the Constitution, and compromising U.S. sovereignty makes such a knee-jerk reaction premature.

A relevant quote that continues to haunt my mind may suffice to get the mental wheels turning:

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor-he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation-he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city-he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.......Cicero, 42 B.C.E.

My argument is as follows. Obama may not exactly be an outright traitor (implying a willingness damage one's country with the full cognizance that one is committing treason) but he is so saturated with the Marxist worldview that he likely believes that by destroying America he will pave the way for a more "just" world. The level of self-delusion required to believe such a fairy tale is astounding, therefore the internal debate regarding the question of whether Obama is indoctrinated to the point of being pre-programmed by communists or if he is an outright traitor who knows exactly what he is doing.

In any event, such an argument is practically insoluble because it turns on intention, which can scarcely be known and is nearly impossible to decisively prove. The deeply embedded underlying assumption regarding the status of Obama as a traitor or a blind ideologue is that intentions matter; this assumption is, obliquely enough, related to the Judeo-Christian concept of the conscience. But we cannot weight Obama's soul against a feather like Osiris, the Egyptian god of the dead; what people need to focus on to determine Obama's fitness for office are Obama's actions and their impact on objective reality. If President Obama's actions violate the Constitution and if they knowingly erode U.S. sovereignty, he is to be impeached and removed from office.

Why is this? Because Obama is exercising powers not granted to him by virtue of his office. He is acting outside the bounds of the rational-legal order, and as such, the legal order must assert its ultimate authority. If not, the U.S. necessarily moves toward anarchy and subsequent tyranny.

It wearies me when people counter-argue that Obama means well, that he is trying his best to improve America ,and just happens to be wreaking severe damage to it economically and politically. More people need to investigate the actual communist program, including the destruction of the "capitalist" United States as a world power. Since the world order since Bretton Woods has been largely Keynesian, we can assume that the Fabian socialist coup began on the world scale in 1944; though the takeover in the U.S. began in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act and the Sixteenth Amendment (a central bank and a progressive income tax being two planks straight out of the Communist Manifesto).

A key progression furthering the cause of world communism was the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971 and the move to a world fiat currency. This gave the left the flexibility to distort and manipulate the economic system of the United States to the point of collapsing it; this the left does by overexpanding the money supply and selling debt to America's enemies. The current leftist agenda in America is an extension of the international system being made to conform to the Hegelian-Marxist worldview that we are to move toward a world communist state. To further this goal, the left's Trotskyist tactic is to infiltrate the United States; capture one or both political parties; and fuse the United States with internationalist neomarxist movements and institutions (the UN and the IPCC, for example). These movements are to further drain the U.S. and subvert its sovereignty.

The left simultaneously sows the seeds for capitalist implosion in any way possible (and has anyway co-opted the economic system through the establishment of fiat currency) to make it more pliable in the hands of the rulers; this is exactly what Obama is doing. This nefarious leftist agenda is flown under the false flags of social justice and "saving us" from the so-called manmade climate change disaster - but what the left's agenda really entails is income redistribution from the U.S. to the rest of the world (being a further drain on America's resources) and the diminution of American soft power by alleging it has committed so-called "climate sins."

The greens of today are the reds of yesteryear. The communists are salivating at the thought of the U.S. ratifying the Copenhagen Treaty. That is what Obama intends to do - to sell out America for a completely contrived neomarxist myth.